Miley Cyrus: Did she even have a chance?

Hanna Montana (Tinkerbell Alter) vs. Miley Cyrus

I was checking my email on Yahoo.com the other day, and happened to see the little news brief about Miley Cyrus and the most recent run in she’s had with the Parents Television Council.  Apparently, the new video for her song “Who Owns My Heart?”, from her Can’t Be Tamed Album, is way too sensual for her young, adolescent, impressionable fan base. The kicker to this whole thing is her father, Billy Ray Cyrus, is on the Parents Television Council board! Well, looks like he picked a fine time to call out sick, because this was the statement issued on behalf of the Parents Television Council regarding the sultry video:

“It is unfortunate that she would participate in such a sexualized video like this one,” Tim Winter of the Parents Television Council said. He further added, “It sends messages to her fan base that are diametrically opposed to everything she has done up to this point. Miley built her fame and fortune entirely on the backs of young girls, and it saddens us that she seems so eager to distance herself from that fan base so rapidly.”

Well, let’s see what the hoopla is all about. Check out her “Who Owns My Heart?” video:

Hmmm….I don’t see what the problem is. I mean isn’t it normal for a 17-year-old ‘virgin’ suppose to be blindfolded and sprawled out on the bed, slinking around like a horny snake? I mean, isn’t that what they are supposed to be doing? As long as she’s staying true to herself, it’s not hurting anything. She’s just having fun, right?

Well, let’s ask an expert

Oh, wow! So, it’s NOT age appropriate for a 17-year-old to look like this? :

Well, I guess it makes sense that Miley has been ‘upgraded’ from her Tinkerbell (Never Grow Up/Alien) Alter, and has been transforming into a full-blown Beta (Sex-Kitten) Alter.

Confusing isn’t it? Well, if you know the way they program these poor Illuppets, you know this isn’t something she came up with on her own. It seems Daddy Cyrus has always been within arms reach of his daughter. Has he been deemed her lifelong ‘handler’? Before we jump to any conclusions, let’s watch this interview they did together.

First off, they look more like a married couple than a father and daughter. And that’s coming from an EXTREME daddy’s girl.

Notice they never once mention her mother, Leticia Finley-Cyrus, who is very much alive and well. Billy Ray seems to have Miley with him at all times. It’s interesting to me is the sabbatical (or what I would like to call Miley’s initial ‘programming’ period) he took to be with his family, and when he decided to make his reemergence back into the world, Miley was right there with him. What’s even more interesting is how he stated he kept telling her this wasn’t the life for her, but allowed her to come to ever single show and let her sing on stage.

Way to use that reverse psychology, Dad!

Something’s not right here…

What other words of wisdom do you have to bestow on your ‘precious’?

Dad says ‘to do what you do best and ignore the critics. Love what you’re doing and stay focused for the “art” and not worry so much about opinion.’

Really? Are you serious, Billy Ray?!

And what, in this day and age, are people all over the world seeing as this CHILD’s best?

To be honest, I could barely get through the first 2 minues of this garbage. If this was Beyonce, Rihanna, hell, even Brittany Spears, I could understand why people would find this appealing, but this is a LITTLE GIRL!!!  I could go on, and on, and on, and on about how Disney has been using this poor child to spoil the minds of countless little girls, and now, young boys. I’ve seen in real life how these innocent children are lead like lambs to slaughter in droves to buy anything and everything Miley Cyrus puts out. And it seems she’s putting out quite a bit of sex. No pun intended.

This is something that has got to stop.

What do you think of the new Miley? Would you want YOUR daughter looking like this?

Even if it is a fake, can you still see the madness in someone actually taking the time to make a fake like this of a 17 year old CHILD?!

Miley at her boyfriend Liam's birthday party 2012

Why would he even have this at HIS party?!?!?!?!?

But hey, THAT’S JUST MY OPINION…

or, maybe this kid shares the same point of view…

 

US apologizes for infecting Guatemalans with STDs in the 1940s

This is the title of an article my friend, Genesis Gemini, found on CNN.com. Here’s the link: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/01/u-s-apologizes-for-infecting-guatemalans-with-stds-in-1940s/.

The long and short of the article states back in the 1940’s the scientific investigation, called the U.S. Public Health Service Sexually Transmitted Disease Inoculation Study of 1946-1948, when the drug penicillin was still pretty new, they wanted to test how good it would work for people that had syphilis, gonorrhea, and chancres. By people, I mean female commercial sex workers (hookers), prisoners in the national penitentiary (predominantly the poor that couldn’t afford proper legal representation in court), and  patients in the national mental hospital (nuff said). and soldiers (double nuff said). And when I say had the illnesses, I mean there were more than 1,600 people purposely injected with the diseases. 696 with syphilis, 772 with gonorrhea and 142 with chancres.

Here’s a direct quote for the article expressing the profound and deep regret of  our top MK altered government officials:

A statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius called the action “reprehensible.”

“We deeply regret that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research practices,” the joint statement said. “The conduct exhibited during the study does not represent the values of the United States, or our commitment to human dignity and great respect for the people of Guatemala.”

President Barack Obama called his Guatemalan counterpart Friday “offering profound apologies and asking pardon for the deeds of the 1940s,” President Alvaro Colom told CNN en Espanol in a telephone interview from Guatemala City.

“Though it happened 64 years ago, it really is a profound violation of human rights,” said Colom, who said the report took him by surprise.

Clinton called him on Thursday, he said. “She too offered her apologies,” he said, adding that she told him she was ashamed the United States had been involved in the matter.

And you know what I have to say to that, right? blah, Blah, BLAH!!!!!

I just love what Hilary says in this line:

“The conduct exhibited during the study does not represent the values of the United States, or our commitment to human dignity and great respect for the people of Guatemala.”

Oh, really, MRS. Clinton? So, what you’re saying  is the government of the United States has just so much respect for the people of Guatemala, it infected over 1,600 poor, helpless, hopeless, and forgotten people with an incurable sexually (or governetally) transmitted diseases? Then tell us, MRS. Clinton, how much respect does the government of the United States have for it’s OWN people?

Well, believe it or not, we actually have an answer for that.

Based on the article provided by CNN (the Liberal’s favorite network), it appears the government of the great United States has quite of bit of respect for it’s people.

Thanks to the wonderful and astute Wellesley College researcher Susan Reverby, we have a slight glimpse as to exactly how much ‘respect’ the government of the United States of America has for the Black community.

This brilliant ‘revolutionary’ (I choose this adjective because what she found took a lot of work to come across, and some extreme bravery to bring to light, thus, hopefully sparking a fire for change)  found the same type of study  was conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama.  These monsters allowed almost  400 poor Black men with preexisting syphilis to progress without treatment. Researchers did not infect the subjects, but they did not tell them they had the disease either. So in other words, when they found out these Black men had the diseases already, and decided, out of RESPECT, they wouldn’t inject them with it, but to better and push forward in medical research, they let them continue on with life, sleeping with whomever they chose, further passing on the disease, providing free research for the government. Way to save the tax payers a buck, huh?

Here’s a direct quote from the article provided by CNN.com:

The Tuskegee study was done under the direction of Dr. John C. Cutler, a U.S. Public Health Service medical officer who died in 2003.

“I was doing what historians do,” said Reverby, a professor of the history of ideas and women and gender issues, who has written a book on the Tuskegee study. She went to the University of Pittsburgh, where Cutler had taught, and searched through an archive of his papers.

“There was nothing on Tuskeegee in the papers, but there was this report of the Guatemala study,” she told CNN in a telephone interview. “I started to read, and I almost fell off my chair.”

She found that Cutler also led the research in Guatemala. It was carried out there, in part, she said, because prostitution was legal and prisoners were allowed to bring prostitutes in for sex.

Well, as far as I’m concerned, Dr. Cutler and Dr.Godel (‘father’ of the famed Gödel Twins from Auschwitz) had the same thing in mind. Finding those that have no power, no hope, and to them, no purpose and give them their purpose…further medical science by killing them, polluting their bodies,  and finding out what their insides look like after they’re dead. BRILLIANT!!!!

But, hey, THAT’S JUST MY OPINION.